Get Permission Sakthivel, Dhakshnamoorthy, Sridharan, and Devi K V: An osteological study of the clavicular facet of the coracoclavicular joint


Introduction

The coracoclavicular joint (CCJ) is a diarthrotic synovial joint present between the conoid tubercle of the clavicle and the superior surface of the horizontal part of the coracoid process of the scapula. 1 In humans, its occurrence is rare, whereas it is evident in primates. The joint has a capsule, synovial lined space, and hyaline articular cartilage that covers the facets on the coracoid and the clavicle close to the subclavius groove.2 Though the coracoclavicular joint is often disregarded as a structure without any significance, its presence has been established as an etiological factor in shoulder pain, and it could be associated with upper limb paraesthesia.3, 4, 5

This joint was first described by Gruber in 1861.6 During development, the cartilaginous procoracoid connects the coracoid process to the clavicle. The procoracoid ultimately forms the coracoclavicular ligament, which usually contains chondrocytes and cartilaginous nodules. The conoid tubercle of the clavicle and coracoid process occasionally grow toward each other, forming a joint covered by a capsule.7 This joint was found to be more prevalent in Asians than in the other races.8 In osteological studies, the prevalence ranged between 0.7% and 10%, and in the radiological studies it was between 0.6% and 21%.9 A higher prevalence of 1.7% to 30% was observed in cadaveric dissections due to the presence of articular cartilage and capsule.9, 10, 11 Thus, the incidence of CCJ shows wide variation according to the type of study. The present study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of the articular facet on the conoid tubercle of the clavicles in the South Indian population.

Materials and Methods

The study was conducted on 277 adult human dry clavicles (118 right and 159 left) of undetermined sex that were available in the Department of Anatomy, ESI Medical College, after excluding the damaged bones. These bones were accessible for undergraduate teaching during the study period of 2018-2022. The occurrence of a smooth articular facet present on the conoid tubercle determined the presence of CCJ. The maximum transverse diameter and anteroposterior diameter of the articular facets were measured using a digital Vernier caliper. The parameters were analyzed using SPSS software version 20 (IBM Corp. Armonk. NY).

Results

The prevalence of CCJ was 4.69%. On the left side, it was observed in 10 bones, and on the right side, in three bones. The shape of the facet was horizontally oval, and the transverse diameter was longer than the anteroposterior diameter (Figure 1). The mean transverse diameter was 8.81±1.86 mm, and the anteroposterior diameter was 6.16±2.39 mm. On the right, it was 10.82±1.6 mm and 8.06±1.09 mm, respectively, and on the left, it was 8.21±1.51 mm and 5.60±2.41 mm, respectively. The differences between the right and left sides were not statistically significant.

Table 1

Geographical distribution and differences in the prevalence of CCJ in different modes of study

Study

Population

Sample size

Prevalence

Type of Study

Kaur and Jit12 1991

Northwest Indian

1000

18.4%

Osteology

Cockshott 13 1992

Chinese

600

21%

Radiology

Nalla and Asvat 14 1994

South African

240

9.6%

Osteology

Gumina et al. 8 2002

Italian

1020

0.8%

Osteology

Nehme et al.10 2003

France

2192

0.82%

Radiology

784

1.78%

Osteology

Joy et al.15 2008

Nigerian

1637

0.55%

Radiology

Das et al.16 2016

Indian

144

5.6%

Osteology

Chopra et al.17 2017

North Indian

1040

3.37%

Radiology

Paparoidamis et al.18 2018

Greece

216

6.5%

Osteology

Harlow et al.19 2021

African American

2724

12%

Osteology

Caucasian American

6%

Present study 2024

South Indian

277

4.69%

Osteology

Figure 1

Shows the clavicular facet on the conoid tubercle of the clavicle (inferior view)

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/6a029a15-25a8-41b9-8331-c0d69eaa814cimage1.jpeg

Discussion

The coracoclavicular joint is a rare synovial joint with articulation between the conoid tubercle of the clavicle and the superior surface of the horizontal part of the coracoid process of the scapula. In radiological studies, the CCJ was determined by the presence of triangular bony outgrowth near the conoid tubercle. However, slight axial rotation of the clavicle while taking an X-ray will exaggerate the conoid tubercle, which could be mistaken for CCJ. A cadaveric study is more reliable because the presence of the articular capsule and cartilage confirms the CCJ, although the sample size might be small. Nevertheless, the dry bone study provides a large sample size to identify the facet on the clavicle or the coracoid process of the scapula.11

Gruber studied 350 cadavers and observed CCJ in eight specimens. 6 Gumina et al. observed CCJ in eight dry bones (0.78%) among 1020 clavicles.8 In a radiological study on 1040 individuals from Northern India, the reported prevalence was 3.37%.17 An osteological study from India demonstrated an increased prevalence of 5.6%,16 whereas, in the adult Nigerian population, the prevalence was 0.55%.15 In a radiological study, it was observed in 0.82% (18 individuals) of the 2192 individuals examined, and in their osteological study on 392 skeletons, the incidence was 1.78%.10 Thus, CCJ has been studied using radiological, cadaveric, and osteological methods with differences in rate of prevalence. Many studies found the clavicular facet to be oval with a long horizontal axis followed by a circular shape.10, 12 The size of the facet in the study by Kaur and Jit ranged between 8 x 6 mm and 17 x 9 mm.12 In the present study, the size ranged between 4 x 6 mm and 11 x 6 mm.

The geographical distribution and prevalence of CCJ in various studies in the literature are shown in Table 1. The occurrence of CCJ is observed to be higher in Asia than in Western Europe, particularly in people of Chinese ancestry, which confirms geographical variations in its existence.13 Several studies reported that CCJ was more prevalent in males.17, 12, 14 The incidence of clavicular facet was 10.1% in males and 8.3% in females in Northwest India.12 Similarly, Nalla and Asvat also found the CCJ to be more prevalent in males (56.5%) than females (43.5%) in the South African population.14 CCJ was found to be more common on the left side,17 and the same was observed in the present study.

The incidence is also found to be higher in people above 30 years of age.19 Paparoidamis et al. observed a higher incidence of CCJ (13.9%) in individuals more than 76 years of age than in those between 61-75 years of age (3.7%).18 Likewise, in South Koreans, the joint was observed in 9.5% of the age group between 40-49 years and 11.4% of those aged 60 years.2 In individuals below 40 years of age, the CCJ was not found, suggesting that the occurrence could be due to ageing. 2 However, CCJ has also been reported in children. Nehme et al. observed CCJ in a 5-year-old and a 7-year-old child.10 Similarly, Kaur and Jit observed CCJ in a 13-year-old child but none in neonates or fetuses.12 Thus, they concluded that environmental factors such as activity could not play a role in its occurrence, and it could not be a congenital anomaly as well. Although it was assumed to be an autosomal dominant trait, there was no genetic evidence.20 According to Saunders, the CCJ does not follow the Mendelian pattern of inheritance. Despite sharing the same genetic makeup, individuals may or may not exhibit the trait. A physiological threshold determines whether the phenotype will be expressed or discontinued, and individuals will manifest the trait only when the threshold is crossed.21 Furthermore, the genetic cause could not be ruled out because of the variations observed in the prevalence of CCJ between different races.13

Although some authors say that there is no relation between the presence of the CCJ and the size of the clavicle and scapula, Nalla et al. observed an increase in the size of neighbouring bones. They observed longer first ribs and lengthened superior, medial, and lateral borders of the scapula with a significant increase in superior angle and proposed that CCJ develops to compensate for the space restrictions caused by the long and narrow scapula with normal thoracic inlet size, which could cause restriction of scapular movements.14 The presence of a CCJ in patients may present as thoracic outlet syndrome.22

Degenerative changes in the CCJ could be one of the causes of painful shoulders.4 CCJ could also predispose to the development of degenerative changes in other neighbouring joints, such as the acromioclavicular joint.9 Cheung et al. studied the microscopic structure of a resected CCJ and observed that the facet on the coracoid process had fibrocartilage lining, resembling the repair tissue following cartilage injury. In contrast, the clavicular facet was lined by mature hyaline cartilage.3 Thus, the presence of CCJ has been established as an etiological factor in shoulder pain and could be associated with upper limb paraesthesia as well.3, 4 Shoulder pain due to the confirmed presence of CCJ by imaging could be managed conservatively or by surgical resection depending on the severity of symptoms.3

Conclusion

In the South Indian population, with a prevalence of 4.69% in this study, the presence of CCJ could not be considered a rare anomaly. Awareness of the CCJ is essential in diagnosing and managing shoulder pain. Even though it is usually asymptomatic and incidentally diagnosed, the possibility of CCJ occurrence should be considered in the differential diagnosis of unexplained shoulder pathology.

Sources of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Acknowledgements

“The authors sincerely thank those who donated their bodies to science so that anatomical research could be performed. Results from such research can potentially increase mankind's overall knowledge which can then improve patient care. Therefore, these donors and their families deserve our highest gratitude."

References

1 

G Paraskevas ME Stavrakas A Stoltidou Coracoclavicular joint, an osteological study with clinical implications: a case reportCases J200928715

2 

BP Cho HS Kang Articular facets of the coracoclavicular joint in KoreansActa Anat (Basel)199816315662

3 

TF Cheung AL Boerboom RF Wolf RL Diercks A symptomatic coracoclavicular jointJ Bone Joint Surg Br200688151920

4 

AP Nikolaides AR Dermon KA Papavasiliou JM Kirkos Coracoclavicular joint degeneration, an unusual cause of painful shoulder: a case reportActa Orthop Belg200672902

5 

I Willekens MD Maeseneer C Boulet F Verhelle Jd Mey Coracoclavicular joint with shoulder painJ Belgian Soc Radiol20139614410.5334/jbr-btr.190

6 

W Gruber Die OberschulterhackenschleimbeutelMémoires de l'Académie impériale des sciences deL'AcadémieSt.-Petersburg1861138

7 

WHD DeHaas MJ Kingma DF Drucker D F The coracoclavicular joint and related pathological conditionsAnn Rheum Dis19652425766

8 

S Gumina M Salvatore PD Santis L Orsina F Postacchini Coracoclavicular joint: osteologic study of 1020 human claviclesJ Anat200220165139

9 

VK Singh PK Singh R Trehan S Thompson R Pandit V Patel Symptomatic coracoclavicular joint: incidence, clinical significance and available management optionsInt Orthop2011351218216

10 

A Nehme JL Tricoire G Giordano D Rouge P Chiron J Puget Coracoclavicular joints. Reflections upon incidence, pathophysiology and etiology of the different formsSurg Radiol Anat2004261338

11 

MA Williamson A review of the coracoclavicular joint: Description, etiology, and clinical significanceClin Anat202336571525

12 

H Kaur I Jit Brief communication: coracoclavicular joint in Northwest IndiansAm J Phys Anthropol199185445760

13 

SS Das A Mahajan N Vasudeva Morphometric Study of Clavicular Facet of Coracoclavicular Joint in Adult Indian PopulationJ Clin Diagn Res2016104811

14 

ER Harlow LM Sasala CE Talbot BJ Desai J Ina S Miskovsky Prevalence and Morphology of the Coracoclavicular Joint: An Osteological Study of 2,724 Subjects Using Univariable and Multivariable Logistic Regression AnalysesFront Surg20218761441

15 

J Chopra A Rani P Bajpai P Manik Prevalence of coracoclavicular joint in northern India: Radiological evidenceJCDR20171114

16 

OE Joy GS Oladipo MA Eroje IE Edibamode Incidence of coracoclavicular joint in adult Nigerian populationSci Res Essays200831657

17 

G Paparoidamis T Trentzidis K Otountzidis N Piagkou M Natsis K Coracoclavicular joint: clinical significance and correlation to gender, side and ageAnatomy2018125760

18 

WP Cockshott The geography of coracoclavicular jointsSkeletal Radiol1992212257

19 

S Nalla R Asvat Incidence of the coracoclavicular joint in South African populationsJ Anat1995186Pt 36459

20 

VK Pillay The coraco-clavicular jointNihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi19805410135

21 

SR Saunders Non-metric skeletal variationReconstruction of life from the skeleton6AR LissNew York198995108

22 

H Hama Y Matsusue H Ito T Yamamuro Thoracic outlet syndrome associated with an anomalous coracoclavicular joint. A case reportJ Bone Joint Surg Am199375913689



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 28-06-2024

Accepted : 04-07-2024


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijcap.2024.017


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 488

PDF Downloaded: 122



Medical Abbreviation List